This is a good read on why all those claiming the likes of #Debian are more stable, production ready or whatever else than Arch, Fedora, Gentoo etc. are full of it.
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Web-Browser-Packages-Debian
Debian is not more stable, it's just old. That's it. Unless you're on a non-stable branch of Debian you're getting outdated, flawed software that's full of (known(!) security holes.
I am sorry folks but this is not my idea of maturity, stability or whatever else people want to claim.
@MatejLach we need gov'ts to recognise the importance of digital infrastructure and find it, like they do physical infrastructure (or perhaps better :) as some of them are pretty crap at that, too - yes, US, looking at you). These tools are core to most people's software interaction whether they realise it or not.
@MatejLach *should've been "fund it" not "find it", of course :)
It's not like Debian has the capacity to backport important security fixes on its own, for packages unsupported by upstream they'll just be left in a state of decay forever.